Skip to main content
· 7/1/1996

Cadle Co. v. Bankers Federal Savings FSB

Citations

  • 929 F. Supp. 636
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9319

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • abstaining where “the claims of all parties in interest can satisfactorily be adjudicated in the state court proceedings currently pending”
  • “The abstention doctrine may be invoked either through a stay or dismissal of the action.”
  • “Declaratory judgment actions which have as their underlying basis rights that are essentially governed by state law present particularly appropriate cases for application of the abstention doctrine.”
  • “Declaratory judgment actions which have as their underlying basis rights that are essentially governed by state law present particularly appropriate cases for application of the abstention doctrine.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Glasser

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.