Cadillac Oil & Gas Co. v. Harrison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that litigants “misapprehend[ed] the purpose of a motion for reconsideration under Rule 54(b)”
• Aggrieved parties may not \put a finer point on their old arguments and dicker about matters decided adversely to them.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).