Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Roy J. Elizondo III and Roy J. Elizondo III, Pllc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[court] need not adhere strictly to the statutory words if to do so would lead to an absurd result or contravene the clear intention of the Legislature”
• \[court] need not adhere strictly to the statutory words if to do so would lead to an absurd result or contravene the clear intention of the Legislature\
• court “need not adhere strictly to the statutory words if to do so would lead to an absurd result or contravene the clear intent of the Legislature”
• dictum in prior SJC decision is entitled to “little weight”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).