Caddy Oil Co. v. Sommer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting argument 15 that a unilateral modification provision was procedurally unconscionable because plaintiffs 16 did “not argue that Lyft modified the [Terms of Service] so frequently or significantly as to 17 make it oppressive”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).