Caciopoli v. Howell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to review claim challenging amount of prejudgment remedy due to inadequate record
• ‘‘[a] prejudgment attachment is a provisional remedy afforded to a claimant to secure satisfaction of a judgment in the future’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “The plain language of Rule 1.5 of the Rules of Professional Conduct allows for an exception to the requirement that a fee agreement be in writing when an attorney is charging a regularly represented client.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).