· 9/8/2008
Cachia v. Islamorada
Citations
- 542 F.3d 839
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 19158
- 2008 WL 4118147
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing the dismissal of a discriminatory-effects claim because the complaint alleged that the challenge ordinance did “not simply raise the costs of operating a [chain] restaurant in Islamorada, but entirely prohibit[ed] such restaurants from opening”
- reversing the dismissal of a discriminatory-effects claim because the complaint alleged that the challenge ordinance did “not simply raise the costs of operating a [chain] restaurant in Islamorada, but entirely prohibit[ed] such restaurants from opening”
- reversing the dismissal of a discriminatory- effects claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tjoflat, Black, Restani
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.