Skip to main content
· 9/8/2008

Cachia v. Islamorada

Citations

  • 542 F.3d 839
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 19158
  • 2008 WL 4118147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing the dismissal of a discriminatory-effects claim because the complaint alleged that the challenge ordinance did “not simply raise the costs of operating a [chain] restaurant in Islamorada, but entirely prohibit[ed] such restaurants from opening”
  • reversing the dismissal of a discriminatory-effects claim because the complaint alleged that the challenge ordinance did “not simply raise the costs of operating a [chain] restaurant in Islamorada, but entirely prohibit[ed] such restaurants from opening”
  • reversing the dismissal of a discriminatory- effects claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tjoflat, Black, Restani

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.