Supreme Court of Missouri· 1/17/2012

CACH, LLC v. Askew

Citations

358 S.W.3d 58
2012 WL 135395
2012 Mo. LEXIS 4

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that records origi- nally created by banks were inadmissible through the testimony of the plaintiff’s records custodian, who lacked personal knowledge of the banks’ record-keeping practices
reaffirming that “[c]ourts have a duty to determine if a party has standing prior to addressing the substantive issues of the case.”
stating that, to be a “qualified witness” pursuant to § 490.680, a person “must have ‘sufficient knowledge of the business operation and methods of keeping records of the business to give the records probity’”
also citing C & W Asset Acquisition, LLC v. Somogyi, 136 S.W.3d 134, 140 (Mo.App. 2004)
“Courts have a duty to determine if a party has standing prior to addressing the substantive issues of the case.”
\A party has standing to sue when it has a 'justiciable interest in the subject matter of the action.'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breckenridge, Draper, Fischer, Hayes, Price, Russell, Stith, Teitelman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.