Caceres v. Ramirez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Tlingit & Haida Indians held aboriginal rights in southeast Alaska because they “exclusively used and occupied all of that area of southeastern Alaska” as shown in a map attached to the order
• holding that the Tlingit & Haida Indians held aboriginal rights in southeast Alaska because they “exclusively used and occupied all of that area of southeastern Alaska” as shown in a map attached to the order
• holding evidence established that aboriginal title was taken by government over time
• referring to \use and occupancy title of the ... Indians\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).