Cabrera v. NYC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The Second Circuit has repeatedly ruled that ‘multiple incidents of discrimination, even similar ones, that are not the result of a discriminatory policy or mechanism do not amount to a continuing violation.’” (citation omitted)
• “The Second Circuit has repeatedly ruled that ‘multiple incidents of discrimination, even similar ones, that are not the result of a discriminatory policy or mechanism do not amount to a continuing violation.’” (citation omitted)
• “The Second Circuit has repeatedly ruled that multiple incidents of discrimination, even similar ones, that are not the result of a discriminatory policy or mechanism do not amount to a continuing violation.” (citation omitted)
• “The Second Circuit has repeatedly ruled that ‘multiple incidents of discrimination, even similar ones, that are not the result of a discriminatory policy or mechanism do not amount to a continuing violation.’” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).