Cabrera v. Charter Communications, L.L.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that prejudgment remedy documents, even when they provide notice of action, do not satisfy statute of limitations
• Including an unsigned summons and complaint does not commence an action or toll the statute of limitations.
• affirming dismissal because of lack of jurisdiction when summons and complaint were not signed
• affirming dismissal because of lack of jurisdiction when summons and complaint were not signed
• prejudgment remedy documents served upon defendant lacked signed writ of summons and complaint, therefore, court held that action was not commenced by such service
• prejudgment remedy documents that lacked signed writ of summons did not effect commencement of action within meaning of § 52-45a or rule enunciated in Hillman v. Greenwich, supra, 520

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).