· 8/21/2009
Cabral v. Martins
Citations
- 177 Cal. App. 4th 471
- 99 Cal. Rptr. 3d 394
- 2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1483
- 2009 WL 2581365
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- when awarding attorney’s fees pursuant to a statutory fee-shifting provision, lodestar determination in California requires consideration of prevailing hourly rates “for similar work.”
- \A ruling on a special motion to strike under section 425.16 is reviewed de 11ovo.\
- “Case law establishes that communications that are intimately intertwined with, and preparatory to, the filing of judicial proceedings qualify as petitioning activity for the purpose of the anti-SLAPP statute.”
- “Case law establishes that communications that are intimately intertwined with, and preparatory to, the filing of judicial proceedings qualify as petitioning activity for the purpose of the anti-SLAPP statute.”
- “Case law establishes that communications that are GRAHAM-SULT V. CLAINOS 15 intimately intertwined with, and preparatory to, the filing of judicial proceedings qualify as petitioning activity for the purpose of the anti-SLAPP statute.”
- applying de nova review to an anti-SLAPP appeal
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ruvolo
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.