Skip to main content
· 8/21/2009

Cabral v. Martins

Citations

  • 177 Cal. App. 4th 471
  • 99 Cal. Rptr. 3d 394
  • 2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 1483
  • 2009 WL 2581365

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • when awarding attorney’s fees pursuant to a statutory fee-shifting provision, lodestar determination in California requires consideration of prevailing hourly rates “for similar work.”
  • \A ruling on a special motion to strike under section 425.16 is reviewed de 11ovo.\
  • “Case law establishes that communications that are intimately intertwined with, and preparatory to, the filing of judicial proceedings qualify as petitioning activity for the purpose of the anti-SLAPP statute.”
  • “Case law establishes that communications that are intimately intertwined with, and preparatory to, the filing of judicial proceedings qualify as petitioning activity for the purpose of the anti-SLAPP statute.”
  • “Case law establishes that communications that are GRAHAM-SULT V. CLAINOS 15 intimately intertwined with, and preparatory to, the filing of judicial proceedings qualify as petitioning activity for the purpose of the anti-SLAPP statute.”
  • applying de nova review to an anti-SLAPP appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruvolo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.