Cabral v. Arruda

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the surveilling party has a right to depose plaintiff before producing the surveillance materials
• holding that photographs and films are within the scope of Rule 26
• granting work-product protection to surveillance photos taken by investigator hired by the defendant’s attorney after litigation commenced
• providing examples of uses of surveillance material that can establish that they were made in anticipation of litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).