Cabot Corporation v. The United States, Hules Mexicanos, S.A. And Negromex, S.A., Intervenors-Appellants

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that this requirement serves to avoid “unnecessary piecemeal appellate review without precluding later appellate review of the legal issue or any other determination made on a complete administrative record”
• noting that this requirement serves to avoid “unnecessary piecemeal appellate review without precluding later appellate review of the legal issue or any other determination made on a complete administrative record”
• quoting, inter alia, Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord, 449 U.S. 368, 373 (1981)
• quoting, inter alia , Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord, 449 U.S. 368 , 373, 101 S.Ct. 669 , 66 L.Ed.2d 571 (1981)
• government failed to request certification of interlocutory order of the Court of International Trade
• an order seeking “additional findings, determination, .and redetermination” from the agency is not final for purposes of appellate review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).