Skip to main content

Cable v. State

Citations

  • 18 So. 3d 37
  • 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12890
  • 2009 WL 3248152

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that Hudson did not “displace the existing Florida precedent, which mandates the application of the exclusionary rule”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larose, Canady, Charles, Demers, David

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.