District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/4/2009
Cable v. State
Citations
- 18 So. 3d 37
- 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 12890
- 2009 WL 3248152
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that Hudson did not “displace the existing Florida precedent, which mandates the application of the exclusionary rule”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Larose, Canady, Charles, Demers, David
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. CableSupreme Court of Florida· 2010-12-09· cited 16×
- State v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-12· cited 1×
- Soto v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-30· cited 1×
- State v. FernandezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-17
- State of Florida v. Keith Alexander TimesSupreme Court of Florida· 2026-06-25
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.