Third Circuit· 1/31/1989
Cable Investments, Inc. v. Woolley
Citations
- 867 F.2d 151
- 1989 WL 5908
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- referring to House Report as “the principal source of legislative history on the Cable Act”
- rejecting a franchised cable company’s argument grounded upon the same passage of legislative history
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Debevoise, Hutchinson, Sloviter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cyber Promotions, Inc. v. American Online, Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1996-12-20· cited 25×
- Flagg v. Control DataE.D. Pennsylvania· 1992-11-20· cited 23×
- Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. Heritage Cablevision of Dallas, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1989-12-14· cited 15×
- Council v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-01-15· cited 12×
- Cable Holdings of Georgia, Inc. v. McNeil Real Estate Fund VI, Ltd.Eleventh Circuit· 1992-02-12· cited 12×
- Media General Cable of Fairfax, Inc. v. Sequoyah Condominium Council of Co-OwnersFourth Circuit· 1993-03-29· cited 12×
- Century Southwest Cable Television, Inc. v. Ciif AssociatesNinth Circuit· 1994-08-18· cited 11×
- Cable TV Fund 14-A, Ltd. v. Property Owners Ass'n Chesapeake Ranch Estates, Inc.D. Maryland· 1989-02-14· cited 7×
- Cable Investments, Inc. v. WoolleyFirst Circuit· 1989-01-31· cited 6×
- Genty v. Township of GloucesterD. New Jersey· 1990-05-10· cited 6×
- Media General Cable of Fairfax, Inc. v. Sequoyah Condominium Council of Co-OwnersE.D. Virginia· 1990-05-22· cited 5×
- Bowman v. Bank of DelawareD. Delaware· 1989-05-17· cited 2×
- Cable Holdings of Georgia, Inc. v. McNeil Real Estate Fund VI, Ltd.Eleventh Circuit· 1993-03-23· cited 2×
- Stephen West v. Charter Communications, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2020-03-02
- Zito Media, L.P. v. HaggertyM.D. Pennsylvania· 2018-05-29
Cites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court· 1987-03-09· cited 4,149×
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court· 1970-03-03· cited 3,186×
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-11-01· cited 2,703×
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court· 1978-05-15· cited 2,370×
- Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court· 1932-02-23· cited 1,799×
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court· 1982-06-30· cited 1,570×
- United States v. GraceSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 1,050×
- Marsh v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1946-01-28· cited 1,049×
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-12-04· cited 940×
- Hudgens v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1976-03-03· cited 720×
- Nachman Corp. v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 703×
- Lloyd Corp. v. TannerSupreme Court· 1972-05-26· cited 611×
- City of New York v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court· 1988-05-16· cited 254×
- City of Los Angeles v. Preferred Communications, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-02· cited 179×
- Federal Communications Commission v. Florida Power Corp.Supreme Court· 1987-02-25· cited 152×
- Kirby Petroleum Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court· 1946-01-28· cited 149×
- Commonwealth v. TateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-07-14· cited 111×
- Western Pennsylvania Socialist Workers 1982 Campaign v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1986-10-06· cited 91×
- Robison v. Canterbury Village, Inc.Third Circuit· 1988-06-03· cited 57×
- Centel Cable Television Company of Florida v. Admiral's Cove Associates, Ltd.Eleventh Circuit· 1988-01-19· cited 41×
Other cases named Cable Investments, Inc. v. Woolley
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.