Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, although Cable Act does not provide right to contested ease hearing, a hearing may be required by constitution
• stating that “[appellate] court[s] attach[] a presumption of correctness to agency decisions and show[] deference to an agency’s conclusions in the area of its expertise”
• \[If an] agency's interpretation of a rule corresponds with [the rule's] plain meaning * * * the agency is not deemed to have promulgated a new rule.\
• standard of review for factual findings is whether they are supported by the evidence
• “[respondent had no property interest at stake * * * because it had a mere expectation of and desire for a cable franchise, but no legitimate claim of entitlement to a franchise award * * *.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).