Cabinet Mountains Wilderness/scotchman's Peak Grizzly Bears v. R. Max Peterson, U. S. Forest Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no EIS required where project was modified prior to implementation by adding specific mitigation measures that completely compensated for any adverse environmental impacts
• APA arbitrary and capricious standard applied to approval of mining project claimed to violate ESA
• “Since the ESA does not specify a standard of review, judicial review is governed by section 706 of the [APA].”
• “Since the ESA does not specify a standard of review, judicial review is governed by section 706 of the [APA].”
• “Since the ESA does not specify a standard of review, judicial review is governed by section 706 of the Administrative Procedure Act.”
• “Since the ESA does not specify a standard of review, judicial review is governed by section 706 of the [APA].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).