Cabinet for Workforce Development v. Cummins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the importance of the patent condition of the hazard, as well as the employer’s knowledge of the hazard in deter Mining whether a violation was intentional
• \The burden was on the claimant to prove that the employer's intentional violation of a specific safety statute or regulation contributed to his injury.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).