Cabezas v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Blockburger analysis, which concluded that two statutes punished the defendant for the same conduct, gave way to clear legislative intent to permit multiple punishments
• holding that \the Double Jeopardy Clause does no more than prevent the sentencing court from prescribing greater punishment than the legislature intended\
• holding that “the Double Jeopardy Clause does no more than prevent the sentencing court from prescribing greater punishment than the legislature intended”
• holding that “the Double Jeopardy Clause does no more than prevent the sentencing court from prescribing greater punishment than the legislature intended”
• holding that cumulative punishment does not run afoul of the Double Jeopardy Clause if the legislature specifically authorized it
• holding that the Blockburger analy- sis, which concluded that two statutes punished the defendant for the same conduct, gave way to clear legislative intent to permit multiple punishments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).