Cabanne v. De Witt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a claim brought pursuant to a provision of a state worker's compensation statute that provides a cause of action for intentional torts did not \arise under\ the state's workmen's laws
• holding that a claim brought pursuant to . a provision of a. state worker’s compensation statute that provides a cause of action for intentional torts did not “arise under” the state’s workmen’s compensation laws
• “The significant differences between a retaliatory discharge claim and the Mandolidis claim render the decisions remanding retaliatory discharge actions inapplicable here.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).