Caballero v. Central Power and Light Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “when properly requested, jury trials are appropriate for finding the ultimate issues of fact under the TCHRA, but not for fashioning appropriate equitable relief.”
• discussing “our practice in injunction proceedings of requiring submission to the jury of only the ultimate issues of fact, but leaving the purely equitable determinations (expediency, necessity, or propriety of equitable relief) to the judge”
• discussing “our practice in injunction proceedings of requiring submission to the jury of only the ultimate issues of fact, but leaving the purely equitable determinations (expediency, necessity, or propriety of equitable relief) to the judge”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).