C.A. Hobbs, Jr., Inc. v. David Brainard, Susan B. Reyes, and Carol B. Ham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, although “[t]he payment of interest on a promissory note” normally revives a debt, merely sending a non-interest payment without proof that the remitter was expressing a willingness to pay is not sufficient to revive a debt under Tennessee law
• statute of limitations tolled by debtor’s acknowledgment of debt and expression of willingness to pay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).