C5 Medical Werks, LLC v. CeramTec GmbH

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that N.J.S.A. 39:4-50 may be proven through observation or by proof of a blood alcohol content of 0.08% or more
• explaining an appellate court's \standard of review is plenary\ where the trial court \did not take any testimony but relied solely on the same documentary record that is before [the appellate court] on appeal\
• explaining our \standard of review is . . . plenary\ where the PCR judge \did not take any testimony but relied solely on the same documentary record that is before [an appellate court] on appeal\
• explaining an appellate court's \standard of review is . . . plenary\ where the trial court \did not take any testimony but relied solely on the same documentary record that is before [the appellate court] on appeal\
• explaining DUI may be proven by showing either the defendant \operat[ed] a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor\ or \operat[ed] a motor vehicle with a [BAC] of 0.08 [percent] or more\ (quoting N.J.S.A. 39:4- 50(a))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).