Skip to main content
· 9/9/1991

C. William Lange Catherine L. Lange v. James E. Hocker Phyllis E. Hocker James J. Mullally, Jr. Ann E. Mullally Oakhampton Downs Limited

Citations

  • 940 F.2d 359

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the allegedly illegal take- over of a controlling interest in a corporation and the attempt to ratify it was complete and posed no ongoing threat of racketeering activity
  • treating continuity requirement as provable in either of two ways: either by proving a closed-ended pattern of sufficient substance to amount to continued criminal activity, or by proving an open-ended pattern that poses a “threat of continuity”
  • treating continuity requirement as provable in either of two ways: either by proving a closed-ended pattern of sufficient substance to amount to continued criminal activity, or by proving an open-ended pattern that poses a “threat of continuity”
  • plaintiff failed to prove open-ended continuity, because the RICO defendants were no longer in a position with the alleged RICO enterprise to play a management role, precluding any “threat of continuity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bowman, Ross, Hanson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.