C. T. Hellmuth & Associates, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that it “appears settled that one party may not enact legislation which would impose burdens upon the compact absent the concurrence of the other signatories”
• holding that the Maryland Public Information Act did not apply to WMATA although Virginia and the District of Columbia had enacted comparable freedom of information laws
• holding that the Maryland Public Information Act did not apply to WMATA although Virginia and the District of Columbia had enacted comparable freedom of information laws
• applicability of one state’s freedom-of-information law to the bistate agency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).