C. S. Jackson & Co. v. Ahrens & Ott Mnfg. Co.
Citations
- 13 Tiess. 331
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>1. Where the writings passed between the parties constitute the entire contract between them, parol evidence is inadmigai. ble to vary its terms.</p> <p>2. Where a party is charged with the cost of supplying a deficiency in the quantity called for by a contract, it would be a double charge to condemn him also to refund the value of that same deficiency.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for further explanation where FERC failed to adequately explain a new policy
- remanding for further explanation where FERC failed to adequately explain a new policy
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Honor, John, Paul
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.