C. P. A. Co. v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was “court action over the protest of the plaintiff, and fault on the part of the court alone” therefore, the savings statute applied because the court wrongly refused to grant leave to amend a writ which caused the dismissal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).