C., N. O. & T. P. Railway Co. v. Roberts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an indemnification clause that requires one party to “defend, indemnify, and hold harmless” the other party “indicate[s] an intent to restrict indemnification obligations to third party claims”
• finding that an indemnity agreement did not apply to a first party claim when language in the agreement made the most sense in the context of only third-party claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).