Skip to main content
· 4/4/1977

C. Itoh & Co. (America) Inc., a New York Corporation v. The Jordan International Company

Citations

  • 552 F.2d 1228
  • 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 353
  • 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13997

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that buyer “never expressly assented to the challenged arbitration term”
  • noting that buyer \never expressly assented to the challenged arbitration term\
  • limiting \supplementary terms” to those supplied by the stock \gap-filler” provision of Article Two
  • limiting \supplementary terms\ to those supplied by the stock \gap-filler\ provision of Article Two
  • interpreting 9 U.S.C. § 3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fairchild, Sprecher, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.