· 4/4/1977
C. Itoh & Co. (America) Inc., a New York Corporation v. The Jordan International Company
Citations
- 552 F.2d 1228
- 21 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 353
- 1977 U.S. App. LEXIS 13997
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that buyer “never expressly assented to the challenged arbitration term”
- noting that buyer \never expressly assented to the challenged arbitration term\
- limiting \supplementary terms” to those supplied by the stock \gap-filler” provision of Article Two
- limiting \supplementary terms\ to those supplied by the stock \gap-filler\ provision of Article Two
- interpreting 9 U.S.C. § 3
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fairchild, Sprecher, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.