C. I. T. Corp. v. Hagerty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it would undermine attainment of congressional objectives to permit a prisoner to exhaust administrative remedies while proceeding with a federal suit
• holding that a prisoner must exhaust administrative remedies before, not after, filing suit in federal court
• holding that dismissal is required if prisoner does not exhaust prior to filing a 25 complaint, even if he exhausts during the course of litigation
• holding that “a district court must dismiss an action involving prison conditions when the plaintiff did not exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit”
• holding that “a prisoner does not comply with 2 [the exhaustion] requirement by exhausting available remedies during the course of the 3 litigation”
• holding that the PLRA required “presuit exhaustion,” consistent with holdings in the First, Second, Third, Seventh, Tenth, Eleventh, and D.C. Circuits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).