C. F. Mueller Co. v. A. Zeregas Sons

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a court\must accept as true the non-conclusory allegations of [a] motion [to intervene]\
• finding significant risk of prejudice to proposed intervenors because intervention was “their one and only opportunity to define their employment status” with their employer
• distinguishing the would-be intervenor’s case from a situation in which “a third party who has some outstanding monetary claim from one of the parties attempts to intervene to ensure that the outcome of the case preserves as much of its claim as possible”
• \[W]e determine timeliness from the time the potential intervenors learn that their interest might be impaired.\
• “[W]e determine timeliness from the time the potential intervenors learn that their interest might be impaired.”
• “[W]e determine timeliness from the time the potential intervenors learn that their interest might be impaired.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).