C. B. Wright v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that trial courts may exclude evidence under Federal Rule of Evidence 403 without request
• “This is a question of legal relevance, a matter on which the trial judge has wide discretion, and which the appellate court will not reverse unless the trial judge has clearly abused his discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).