Byung Moo Soh v. TARGET MARKETING SYSTEMS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• use of “and” required all factors listed in section 2 of the Wage Act to be present
• “ ‘Promissory fraud’ is a form of fraud based upon a false representation of intent concerning future conduct, e.g., a promise to perform a contract when there is actually no intent to perform the contract.”
• “ ‘Promissory fraud’ is a form of fraud based upon a false representation of intent concerning future conduct, e.g., a promise to perform a contract where there is actually no intent to perform the contract.”
• “a person who does not fit all three requirements cannot be excluded from the class of people who are to be considered employees under this section of the [IWPCA].”
• “ ’Promissory fraud’ is a form of fraud based upon a false representation of intent concerning future conduct, e.g., a promise to perform a contract when there is actually no intent to perform the contract.”
• “ ‘Promissory fraud’ is a form of fraud based upon a false representation of intent concerning future conduct, e.g., a promise to perform a contract where there is actually no intent to perform the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).