Byun Sik Chu v. Kerrigan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “when the conduct is isolated or infrequent, it is less likely to establish the requisite intolerability”
• holding that for a constructive discharge claim, “the plaintiff must show “something more’ than the showing required for a hostile work environment claim” (quoting Penn. State Police v. Suders, 542 U.S. 129, 147 (2004))
• holding that for a constructive discharge claim based on a hostile work environment, “the plaintiff must show ‘something more’ than the showing required for a hostile work environment claim” (quoting Penn. State Police v. Suders, 542 U.S. 129, 147 (2004))
• noting that in order to establish a constructive discharge, “the plaintiff must show ‘something more’ than the showing required for a hostile work environment claim”
• explaining that a “plaintiff must show ‘something more’ than 7 the showing required for a hostile work environment claim” to support a constructive discharge claim (citation omitted)
• stating that for a constructive discharge claim based on a hostile work environment, “the plaintiff must show ‘something more’ than the showing required for a hostile work environment claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).