Bysom Enterprises, Ltd. v. Peter Carlton Enterprises, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that estab- lished rules of contract construction do not allow one provision of contract to take away, by negative infer- ence, what another provision expressly grants
• \The parties' intent as to the scope of a contract is irrelevant where the language of the contract is clear and unambiguous.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).