Skip to main content
· 12/1/1997

Byrton Dairy Products, Inc. v. Harborside Refrigerated Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 991 F. Supp. 977
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19225
  • 1997 WL 827392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying motion for summary judgment on cross claims for indemnity because question of fact existed as to cause of spoilation of goods
  • awarding breach of contract damages after determining defendant was not a freight forwarder for Carmack liability
  • denying motion for summary judgment on cross claims for indemnity because question of fact existed as to cause of spoilation of goods
  • awarding breach of contract damages after determining defendant was not a freight forwarder for Carmack liability
  • limiting damages in a breach of contract claim against a broker to the amount specified in the contract; stating that “[s]ince the Carmack Act is held to be inapplicable, no applicable ground is argued for declining to enforce the limitation of liability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.