Skip to main content
· 3/31/1999

Byron K. Morse v. Craig Hanks

Citations

  • 172 F.3d 983
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 5790
  • 1999 WL 177270

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • suggesting in dicta that a perfunctory voir dire would not establish even a prima facie case of discrimination where the excused juror “had given an answer that would expose a clear basis for the state to want to remove him from the pool with a peremptory challenge”
  • “A prima facie case of purposeful discrimination can be established where the prosecution uses a peremptory challenge to strike the only black venireman in the panel.”
  • “A prima facie case of purposeful discrimination can be established where the prosecution uses a peremptory challenge to strike the only black venireman in the panel.”
  • “A prima facie case of purposeful discrimination can be established where the prosecution uses a peremptory challenge to strike the only black venireman in the panel.”
  • “A prima facie case of purposeful discrimination can be established where the prosecution uses a peremptory challenge to strike the only black venireman in the panel.”
  • “A prima facie case of purposeful discrimination can be established where the prosecution uses a peremptory challenge to strike the only black venireman in the panel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Rovner, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.