Byron C. Darling, III v. Mobil Oil Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• employing objective standard when determining whether franchisee complied with “reasonable” franchise provision
• “Congress rejected the former reasonableness test and inserted the current ‘good faith and normal course of business’ language in its place”
• “its paramount objective is to redress disparities in bargaining power and to prevent the ensuing arbitrary termination.”
• PMPA directed at \the Dav Goliath aspect of the relationship between the small retailer franchisee an petroleum company franchisor\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).