Byrne v. State
Citations
- 50 Miss. 688
Syllabus
<p>1. Taxes — Collection thereof — Sheriffs. — The Code of 1857, p. 71, provides that sheriffs shall 'be ex-officio fax collectors of their counties. This provision is not embraced in the Code of 1871, though frequent mention is made of tax collectors, their duties, fees, etc., in the code. Quaere. Is this provision of the Code of 1857 repealed by § 8 of the Code of 1871? If so, then sheriffs are tax collectors by virtue of their elections as sheriff's, for the collection of taxes was incident to and part and parcel of the duties of sheriffs when the constitution was ratified in 1869.</p> <p>2. Officers — Estoppel.—An officer in possession of an office, exercising its functions and enjoying its emoluments, is estopped from denying his title or right to the office as justification for malfeasance or misfeasance in office. Nor can the sureties on his official bond set up such a defense when called upon to make good any default, etc.</p>
Judges: Simrall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Board of County Commissioners v. State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1896-02-07· cited 24×
- Boone County Bank v. ByrumSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1900-03-31· cited 16×
- Jones v. HadfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1936-02-17· cited 9×
- State v. CooperMississippi Supreme Court· 1876-10-15· cited 8×
- French v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1876-07-01· cited 7×
- Taylor v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1875-10-15· cited 6×
- State v. HarneyMississippi Supreme Court· 1880-04-15· cited 6×
- Henry v. State ex rel. CoodyMississippi Supreme Court· 1922-09-15· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.