Byrne v. Oester Trucking, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding a question of fact concerning serious injury where plaintiff’s doctor testified that his ability to tilt to the left was diminished by 25–30% manifesting in difficulty climbing and bending
• court credited range of motion testimony because it was supported by other “objective medical evidence,” such as an MRI

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).