Skip to main content
· 5/15/1842

Byrne v. Hooper

Citations

  • 2 Rob. 229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that a restrictive covenant “if enforced at all, it must be enforced according to its terms”
  • holding a non-compete agreement is valid if it is reasonable, provides fair protection to the employer, and does not interfere with the interests of the public

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.