Skip to main content
· 3/18/2013

Byrd v. Vilsack

Citations

  • 931 F. Supp. 2d 27
  • 2013 WL 1095850
  • 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36728
  • 117 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1856

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Importantly, the plaintiff must establish that the allegedly harassing conduct complained of was based on a protected characteristic.”
  • “[T]he denial of an employee’s request to work from home on a few occasions, without more, does not constitute an adverse employment action under Title VII . . . under the . . . standard applicable to retaliation claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Robert L. Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.