Byrd v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• both holding that the question does not amount to an equivocal invocation of the right to counsel
• both holding that the question does not amount to an equivocal invocation of the right to counsel
• defendant did not request counsel by asking officer whether the defendant needed a lawyer

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Stephenson
  Tennessee Supreme Court· 1994-05-09· cited 598×
• Underwood v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-09-14· cited 37×
• Crawford v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2011-01-10· cited 24×
• Hopkins v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1993-09-20· cited 9×
• Caldwell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-05-16· cited 6×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-09-05· cited 3×
• Copeland v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-09-26· cited 3×
• Rose v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-02-09· cited 2×
• Karras v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-05-28· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Smith v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,225×
• Crawford v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1980-01-04· cited 291×
• Hall v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1985-12-05· cited 37×
• McKenzie v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-06-23· cited 34×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1983-04-11· cited 16×