Byrd v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting an invasion of privacy claim because it was based on \the same factual allegations and legal argument\ as the defamation claim
• rejecting an invasion of privacy claim because it was based on \the same factual allegations and legal argument\ as the defamation claim
• “When words and pictures are presented together, each is an important element of what, in toto, constitutes the publication.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).