Byrd v. Hopson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that interrogatory answers describing conversations participated in by someone other than person answering interrogatories were “inadmissible hearsay”
• finding that a judge-ordered patdown of a litigant for weapons was the equivalent of a Terry stop, given that the judge was aware of specific facts that led him to believe the litigant was armed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).