Byrd v. City of Hartsville

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the \some degree of permanence\ and \public use\ elements from the traditional four-element inverse condemnation test do not apply to regulatory inverse condemnation
• finding that an inverse condemnation claim involving denial of less than all economically viable use is governed by Penn Central
• finding an eleven-month delay in evaluating the rezoning of certain property did not result in a regulatory taking and inverse condemnation
• “Takings analysis under South Carolina law is the same as the analysis under federal law.”
• \Takings analysis under South Carolina law is the same as the analysis under federal law.\
• “To the extent that some of our previous cases have applied Agins alone or both Agins and Penn Central, we overrule them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).