Supreme Court of South Carolina· 11/2/1983
Byrd v. Byrd
Citations
- 308 S.E.2d 788
- 279 S.C. 425
- 1983 S.C. LEXIS 367
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that evidence of undue influence can include an unnatural disposition that makes the influencer the chief beneficiary of the will
- finding evidence of undue influence where \[t]here was also evidence of a purpose and design ... to restrict the visits and to prevent communications between the testator and his children prior to and following the date of the execution of the will\
- Testator was infirm, both physically and mentally, prior to and contemporaneously with the execution of the will. The beneficiary threatened to send the testator to a nursing home, and visitation was severely restricted by the beneficiary. The will was voided for undue influence.
- affirming jury determination concerning mental capacity
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ness, Lewis, Gregory, Littlejohn, Harwell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hanahan v. SimpsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-05-12· cited 74×
- Russell v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-02-24· cited 44×
- Wilson v. DallasSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-11-01· cited 30×
- In Re Estate of CumbeeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-01-04· cited 24×
- Bullard v. CrawleySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-11-23· cited 16×
- Hembree v. Estate of HembreeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1993-02-11· cited 15×
- In Re Last Will and Testament of SmoakSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-08-09· cited 14×
- Howard v. NasserCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-05-02· cited 14×
- Macaulay v. Wachovia Bank of South Carolina, N.A.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-06-27· cited 7×
- Alexander v. WaldenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1985-11-14· cited 5×
- Swiger by and through DeHaven v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-04-10· cited 3×
- MacAulay v. WACHOVIA BANK OF SC, NACourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-06-27
- Gunnells v. HarknessCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2020-04-01
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lackey v. LackeySupreme Court of Alabama· 1954-10-28· cited 22×
- Calhoun v. CalhounSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-04-07· cited 20×
- Gunnels v. RoachSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1963-12-03· cited 17×
- Harris v. Thelma McIntosh BerrySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1957-05-07· cited 14×
- Havird v. SchissellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1969-03-17· cited 13×
- Hubbard v. MoseleySupreme Court of Alabama· 1954-11-11· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.