Bynoe v. Riverside Church

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Commonwealth’s interlocutory appeal did not violate Rule 600 when the Commonwealth had a right to appeal that would be moot after trial and there was no evidence that the Commonwealth took the appeal as a delay tactic
• holding that Commonwealth's interlocutory appeal did not violate Rule 600 when the Commonwealth had a right to appeal that would be moot after trial and there was no evidence that the Commonwealth took the appeal as a delay tactic
• finding that Commonwealth’s unsuccessful two-year interlocutory appeal to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania tolled the speedy trial rule time, when such appeal was taken for tactical reasons and not for delay
• finding Commonwealth’s unsuccessful two-year interlocutory appeal to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania tolled the speedy trial rule time, when such appeal was taken for tactical reasons and not for delay
• finding Commonwealth’s unsuccessful two-year interlocutory appeal to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania tolled the speedy trial rule time, when such appeal was taken for tactical reasons and not for delay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).