Bykhovski v. Neurocog Trials

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “repeated failure to cure deficiencies by amendments previously allowed” may be grounds for denying leave to amend (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962))
• denying the plaintiffs motion to amend her complaint to assert a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the ERISA plan administrator under section 1132(a)(3) as futile because she had an adequate legal remedy against the insurer under section 1132(a)(1)(B)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).