Byers v. Evans

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding similar facts did not trigger landowner duty under § 379A, assuming it applied, where there was no “joint control” over animals, fences, or pens
• holding similar facts did not trigger landowner duty under § 379A, assuming it applied, where there was no “joint control” over animals, fences, or pens
• holding similar facts did not trigger landowner duty under § 379A, assuming it applied, where there was no “joint control” over animals, fences, or pens
• rejecting application of section 379A to escaped swine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).